in ,

Sedition should go

On Thursday, the Supreme Court quashed a sedition case filed against journalist Vinod Dua by a Bharatiya Janata Party leader over remarks aimed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Dua’s YouTube show. The court observed that every scribe is entitled to the protection granted under its Kedar Nath Singh judgement of 1962, which had laid down the ambit of our law on ‘sedition’.

This is a relief. Neither the country nor its constitutional apparatus of governance can be conflated with any individual leader. And criticism in itself is not seditious. Free speech is among the hallmarks of real democracy, and that includes the right to air critiques. The trouble with our provision that outlaws sedition is that it was written in the days of the British raj and has words that can be interpreted to squash dissent. This served our colonial overlords quite well. But India, as a free country, needs to maximize the freedom of its people within reasonable bounds. It’s thus welcome that our apex court might also be considering a review of that law. It’s often misused as a tool of harassment and needs to be scrapped. We have enough laws to deal with real threats to national security.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint.
our App Now!!×338/supremecourt-kYcF–621×414@LiveMint_1622741260202.JPG

Feed By

Source link

Written by NEWZ HAWKER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As the debate on the subject took on a serious turn in recent days with new intelligence details emerging about several researchers at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) falling ill in November 2019 and being hospitalized (Photo: Reuters)

A confrontation is brewing over the pandemic’s origin

Calibrated closures: On localised lockdowns

Digital tax tussles